Death, Disaster, Disease, and God

Part one of three in a series on the sovereignty of God

By James Pruch
February 6, 2008 

What would it be like to worship a God who could get frustrated? What would it be like to worship a God who, when something bad happens, cries, “Ah! I didn’t see that one coming!” What would it be like to worship a God who was in control of about as much as humans are?

I believe that most Christians believe that God has some kind of providence and sovereignty over all things. On the other hand, I believe that a large number of Christians believe God is only sovereign in as much as he doesn’t interfere with our freedom or in as much that he doesn’t cause bad things to happen. God is sovereign, people say. But they may follow that up with, “He doesn’t hurt people or destroy things or make them choose him.” But what does that turn God into? Does that lower God to the stature of a human? If Satan-or something else-was the cause of evil or calamity or damaging weather or people turning away from Christ instead of God himself, then wouldn’t that be performing an act more powerful than God?

This idea permeates much of Western Christianity today. Most American Evangelicals today would say after a natural disaster, “God has a plan” but most wouldn’t say, “God caused this for some reason.” Similarly, when a family member gets cancer, the Christian will say, “God has a plan” but he will not say, “God gave you this for a reason.” Now, I want you to know that not everyone speaks this way, but God’s sovereignty does not seem to me to be a deeply cherished belief among twenty-first century Christians.

There is a school in Evangelical thought today that even goes a step further. This belief says that God does not even know what is going to happen in the future. It is called “Open Theism.” John E. Sanders, a major proponent of this theology, says:

However, in our view, God decided to create beings with interdeterministic freedom which implies that God chose to create a universe in which the future is not entirely knowable, even for God. For many open theists, the “future” is not a present reality-it does not exist-and God knows reality as it is.¹

This is an extreme belief and I would assume most Christians do not hold to this, yet fragments of this doctrine have been filtering through Evangelicalism for generations. My guess would be that many who read this article grew up in an environment where it was taught that God only controls to a certain extent and “allows” other things (namely “bad” things). I grew up in such an environment. But let me ask you this: Can the God who created the universe and owns everything in it be relegated to simply “knowing” certain things and simply “allowing” some things to happen? Wouldn’t an all-powerful, all-sufficient God have to do more than “know” what will happen? And, if you are an Open Theist, wouldn’t a God who is vastly superior to humans, whose standard is perfection (cf. Matt. 5:48), and whose decrees are lovely (cf. Ps. 19:7) be able to do more than just “predict” the future? Perhaps you are fine with that belief. Perhaps you are content with believing in a God who, on some levels, controls no more than you or I. Perhaps you are satisfied with worshiping a God who is Almighty over good and glorious things and one who is helpless over disasters and disease. I am not fine with that.

My contention is that the God of the Bible, Yahweh, is not a frustrated God who is surprised by anything that happens. He is not a God who ever finds humans or Satan doing something that is outside of his will. God is not a God who makes things up as he goes along, adjusting his plans according to the decisions and works of man. I am passionate about God’s sovereignty in the world and in my life and it is my hope that after reading this, you will be persuaded to be passionate about the sovereignty of God as well. The surety that comes with knowing God is in control of everything has been so warming and beautiful to me. I pray you will be able to share it as well. I think this deep truth of Scripture helps us experience the abundant life that Jesus promised in John 10:10.

Over the next three weeks, I want to look at what the Scriptures say about God’s sovereignty and omnipotence. Many people give their opinions and many others-some of whom are my close friends-talk of God’s sovereignty as if it is to be despised, loathed, and a doctrine created by men who want God to look like a deranged puppet-master. For me, it gives rest, peace, comfort, and joy. The first of these three articles will be on God’s sovereignty in natural evil, including death, calamity, and disease. The second will be on God’s sovereignty over moral evil. The third will be on God’s sovereignty in personal salvation. I will try to be as detailed as possible, but for a fuller discussion, I would suggest reading Wayne Grudem, “God’s Providence” in Systematic Theology and/or John Piper’s article, “Is God Less Glorious Because He Ordained That Evil Be?”

First of all, we need to briefly discuss what God’s will is. There are two wills in God. First, there is God’s sovereign will, which is unchanging, eternal, and happens the exact way God planned it. Second, there is God’s revealed will, which is what God commands (or what he plainly tells us we should do). We could use the Ten Commandments as an example of this. These laws can be broken, yet certainly God doesn’t want them to be broken. God’s revealed will falls under the umbrella of his sovereign will. This sovereign will controls everything, upholding the world and ordaining all things, including bringing life and death, sickness and health, and prosperity and calamity (1 Sam. 2:6; Lam. 3:37; Amos 3:6-13; Matt. 5:45; Heb. 1:3). God’s revealed will is what we can know-moral laws, instructions for godliness, etc. Obviously, it is God’s sovereign will that will be the focus of these articles. We will be examining Scriptures that talk about God’s control of all things in the universe, even down to the most insignificant sparrow that dies (Matt. 10:29).

Death
A few years ago, when the tsunami hit the South Pacific, I heard a person say that God had brought that to judge people, but it was also to wake up the survivors and others around the world. In response to this, I heard a friend say that God wouldn’t do something that violent-that he would not kill people like that. Last year, when a friend had cancer, someone said, “Satan caused this. God doesn’t give cancer; he only allows it to happen.” People will say, “Where was God,” when they get the phone call that a loved one died in a car accident. I believe that God is right there, weeping with them, mourning the loss of the family, yet at the same time, he wills the accident, the cancer, the tsunami to happen.

Because God is a dynamic, multi-layered Being who is able to feel far more emotions at one time than we are, the Bible says he ordains death to happen. In 1 Samuel 2:6, Hannah prays for a son and she proclaims, “The Lord kills and the Lord brings to life; he brings down to Sheol and raises up.” During Job’s life, he experienced physically devastating symptoms. In Job 1:20 he says, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked I shall return there. The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away. Blessed be the name of the LORD.” Then in verse 22, it says, “In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.” So, we see that it is not wrong to think this way. In Psalm 135:8, it is said of God, “He it was who struck down the firstborn of Egypt, both of man and of beast.” When someone dies-even by a murder, an evil catastrophe, or something else-though what happened may be wrong, God performs it in a way that is not wrong. Scripture never blames God for sinning when he uses a secondary agent to bring about evil and neither should we.²

Further, in Deuteronomy 32:39 God says, “There is no god besides me; it is I who put to death and give life. I have wounded and it is I who heal, and there is no one who can deliver from my hand.” When Bathsheba became pregnant by David, God punished David by killing the child. Second Samuel 12:15 says, “Then the LORD struck the child that Uriah’s widow bore to David, so that he was sick…Then it happened on the seventh day that the child died.” Even James 4:14-15 says, “Yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. What is your life? For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes. Instead you ought to say, ‘If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.’” These verses show that God is in control of everyone’s life-the smallest infant to the greatest businessman who plans six months ahead.

It’s evident that though God hates evil and does not take pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 18:23), he ordains that it be when and how he decides. God is the giver of life and he is the taker of it. He owes it to no one. Certainly this is not something that Satan or any other human has the power to do.

Disaster
Now, let us look at calamity or what we can also call natural disaster. This is usually accompanied by death, but what about the event itself? What about tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, earthquakes, or hundreds of others including animal attacks, droughts, or floods? Amos 3:6 seems very clear: “Does disaster come to a city unless the Lord has done it?” It was God who brought the flood on the world because of wickedness (Gen. 6:9-7:24). It was God who destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for their sins (19:23-29). In the same way, God brings weather-good or bad-to the earth. God says to Job in Job 38:35, “Can you send forth lightnings, that they may go and say to you, ‘Here we are’?” Psalm 147:18 says, “He causes his wind to blow and waters to fall.” And if that wasn’t enough, from the mouth of our Lord Jesus himself in Matthew 5:45, “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.”

In Psalm 135:7, David writes, “He it is who makes the clouds rise at the end of the earth, who makes lightnings for the rain and brings forth the wind from his storehouses.” In Deuteronomy 11:17, God warns his people to obey him. If they disobey, he will “shut up the heavens, so that there will be no rain, and the land will yield no fruit, and you will perish quickly off the good land that the Lord is giving you.”

Even animals are controlled by God. “And at the beginning of their dwelling there, they did not fear the LORD. Therefore the LORD sent lions among them, which killed some of them” (2 Kings 17:25). And in Daniel 6:22, God “shut the lions’ mouth” and they did not harm Daniel. God controls every living thing, even the smallest living organism, as Piper writes, “If God can shut the mouth of a ravenous lion, then he can shut the mouth of a malaria-carrying mosquito and nullify every other animal that kills.”³

Disease
Of course Job is the greatest example of this in the Bible. But even in Exodus 4:11, God says to Moses, when he was afraid of speaking to Pharaoh, “Who has made man’s mouth? Who makes him dumb, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the LORD?” God is communicating his sovereignty over physical disabilities. John Piper helpfully comments on this:

In other words, behind all disease and disability is the ultimate will of God. Not that Satan is not involved; he is probably always involved one way or the other with destructive purposes (Acts 10:38). But his power is not decisive. He cannot act without God’s permission.4

Paul describes his bout with some kind of ailment in 2 Corinthians. He writes, “So to keep me from being too elated by the surpassing greatness of the revelations, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to harass me, to keep me from being too elated” (12:7). Is this out of God’s control? Did Satan pull a fast-one on God? I don’t think so for the fact that humility would never be a design of Satan. It was God’s plan and Satan was merely being used by God. John MacArthur once said that we should think of Satan as a servant of the Most High God. It may be hard to process that, but Satan can do nothing outside of God’s will. The reason we know this is because in Mark 1:27, Jesus casted out unclean spirits and the people said, “What is this? A new teaching with authority! He commands even the unclean spirits, and they obey him.” Even the most horrific circumstance is not out of God’s power-he even holds Satan in the palm of his hand.

Charles Spurgeon, the great London Baptist pastor, summed this doctrine up beautifully:

I believe that every particle of dust that dances in the sunbeam does not move an atom more or less than God wishes-that every particle of spray that dashes against the steamboat has its orbit, as well as the sun in the heavens-that the chaff from the hand of the winnower is steered as the stars in their courses. The creeping of an aphid over the rosebud is as much fixed as the march of the devastating pestilence-the fall of leaves from a poplar is as fully ordained as the tumbling of an avalanche.

A great comfort verse for me has been Psalm 115:2-3, which says, “Why should the nations say, ‘Where is their God?’ Our God is in the heavens; he does all that he pleases.” God’s sovereignty is not something to be feared. It is something to cherish and love! I pray that you would submit to the God who does all that he pleases. I pray that you would fall more deeply in love with the Almighty God who cannot be manipulated or persuaded to do man’s will. I pray that you would treasure the God who said, “For God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?” (Numbers 23:19).

God will do what he has decreed. He will not change his mind. He is not a man and he is not even like man. He is so far and above what we are or ever will be. May you rest in that greatness and power! He is all-sovereign, all-knowing, and all-powerful. I hope you will embrace that.

“For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor? Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid? For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen” (Rom. 11:36).

Amen.

. . .

Part 2 – How Can a Holy God Ordain Evil to Exist?
Part 3 – God’s Sovereign Choice in Salvation


[1] Open Teism Information. John E. Sanders, Accessed 2/6/08.

[2] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology, p. 325

[3] John Piper, “Is God Less Glorious Because He Ordained That Evil Be?”
[4] Ibid.

12 responses

14 03 2008
davidcooperjr

***God is sovereign, people say. But they may follow that up with, “He doesn’t hurt people or destroy things or make them choose him.” But what does that turn God into? Does that lower God to the stature of a human?***

I don’t think that lowers God’s status. And if it does, how? Why is it hard to believe that God let’s us make our own decisions? If I believe this, does this mean that I’m going to hell?

I do not believe that Satan causes anything but temptation. I also believe it to be fair to consider that God created the earth to go through certain cycles and to “run itself” for lack of a better term. Not that I don’t think he could do, but I don’t believe that God micromanages everyone’s lives.

Also, I don’t claim to KNOW what God is doing or what he’s thinking I just make assumptions. No one can ever know, and if they claim that they do then that finite person is claiming to know what the infinite is thinking…which would ultimately mean that God is not really infinite right?

14 03 2008
James

Do you have Scriptures to back up that God created the world to simply “run its course”?

Do you not see what the Bible teaches here? There’s a lot of Scripture in this article.

Also, I don’t claim to know everything, but what God has done and thinks through Scripture (what he has revealed to us there) can be plain. Truth does not always have to be a mysterious fog. This does not mean that God is less infinite. He simply gives us the mercy and grace to see how he works through his word.

14 03 2008
davidcooperjr

***Do you have Scriptures to back up that God created the world to simply “run its course”?***

It was an oversimplification and not my point. My point was that I don’t think that God micromanages everyone’s lives.

I DON’T have scripture to “back” it up. Do you have scripture to prove otherwise? I think it’s a bit ambiguous…

On more thing. Considering all the contradictions in the bible (which everyone ALWAYS tries to justify) I can’t take EVERYTHING as literal. Don’t get me wrong, I believe in the bible and I use it as a guide, but given the four different stories in the four gospels chosen to be in the bible I have to analyze to the best of my ability what they actually mean. After all, they are just interpretations. They weren’t even written during Jesus’ life. In fact the oldest text (Mark) was written 25-30 years AFTER Jesus died, the others were written at least a hundred years after words.

14 03 2008
James

David, I think that I do have Scripture to prove otherwise. I wrote three articles to show that.

How could Matthew and John (both disciples of Jesus) have written their gospels 100 years after Jesus died? That would have put them, age-wise, near 120 or 130 years old. Matthew is dated between 80 and 100 AD and John is agreed to have been written arond 90 AD. These men both lived with Jesus–yet they are humans and had different perspectives and different audiences, so they therefore focused on different aspects of Jesus’ ministry. Hence differences in the gospels–they they are all complimentary.

You said, “On more thing. Considering all the contradictions in the bible (which everyone ALWAYS tries to justify) I can’t take EVERYTHING as literal.” So, when the Bible says in 2 Samuel 12:15 says, “Then the LORD struck the child that Uriah’s widow bore to David, so that he was sick…Then it happened on the seventh day that the child died” you take that as a metaphor? Is the book of Job a metaphor? Is Amos 3:6 a metaphor? I think that is a poor argument.

And furthermore, if it wasn’t your point, then you probably shouldn’t have said it the way you did. Certainly, it seems you are denying God’s absolute control and power over all things.

15 03 2008
davidcooperjr

***How could Matthew and John (both disciples of Jesus) have written their gospels 100 years after Jesus died?***

Because they didn’t write it. There is no historical evidence that gives implication of John, nor Matthew writing the books. The books were named John and Matthew, because that’s what the Catholic Church named them when they put the bible together. Now, I don’t think that not knowing the authors of the books disproves the overall intentions.

I’ve studied up a bit on the authenticity of the bible’s historical documents. Come to find out, Matthew and Luke (totally different interpretations of Jesus’ death, by the way) “borrowed” or had similar ideas from the book of Mark (which is thought to be the oldest and most authentic book) and they also have sourced from another book which we historians call “Q” because it has disappeared.

Regarding John, (my favorite gospel) it is TOTALLY different from the other three…why is that? And if John and Matthew wrote the books, why are they so vast in differences? No two people associated with Jesus could give such totally different interpretations could they?

Now, don’t think that I’m ridiculing the bible. I’m just looking at it from an historical stand point (since that’s my area of study).

I don’t take ALL parts of the bible as metaphors, and I don’t take all parts of the bible literal. One has to interpret what it actually means to the best of their ability.

I think this is where Christians do wrong. We claim that we interpret the bible all one way or the other (meaning metaphorical or literal), but then we pick and choose which ones are which.

***Certainly, it seems you are denying God’s absolute control and power over all things.***

No I’m not. And to tell me that certainly makes me NOT want to be associated with Christians who blame others of lowering God’s status. What ever happened to “bringing home the prodigal?” This is why agnostics are so hesitant on joining churches, because they are always accused of blasphemy when they ask questions.

15 03 2008
James

You said, “Come to find out, Matthew and Luke (totally different interpretations of Jesus’ death, by the way) “borrowed” or had similar ideas from the book of Mark (which is thought to be the oldest and most authentic book).”

So are you implying that Matthew, Luke, and John are less authentic? Remember, the whole word of God is inspired. It seems as if, looking at your whole argument, that you are alluding to the fact that the gospels (and possbily other parts of the Bible) are not as authentic, and hence not inspired.

15 03 2008
davidcooperjr

By historical standards…yes. There are some parts of the new testament that are “more” authentic if you will. Mark is the oldest document in the new testament. I’m not saying that the other texts aren’t inspired. That’s not my point at all. Besides, why would it be a problem if the writers of Matthew and Luke were inspired by the document of “Mark?” They weren’t written at the same time.

Mark, by historical standards, is thought to be the most authentic because it’s the oldest, therefore other documents (like Matthew and Luke) may be influenced by the document. With ancient documents, the oldest, the more legit. This doesn’t mean that the other books aren’t legit, it just means that Mark is the oldest. Why would saying “one document is older than the other” be such a problem?

27 05 2008
Deane Coleman

Hi James and David.

Firstly, James – many thanks for running this topic, I have been searching the net to try and understand God’s active/ passive role in the recent disasters of Myanmar, China, etc.

Secondly – it is great to see you guys discussing the issue without seemingly letting pride intervene, as is the case with many websites trying to address the above issue (e.g. Yahoo Answers).

Some thoughts:

NT Dating – isn’t there some evidence to suggest at least one of the Pauline letters is earlier than all four Gospels? That the letter or at least content may date as early as approx 53-56AD?

God’s active/ passive role, as follows:

I find no difficulty in accepting that God controls nature (inc’ Cyclones, Earthquakes, etc) in the sense that he created the universe and set nature in motion to runs its own course.

I prefer to think, for example, the cyclone that recently hit Myanmar/ Burma was merely a random event caused by nature in motion.

However, is it God’s fault that so many Burmese live in such appalling conditions that, when a cyclone passes by, it affects them so badly?

I believe that this was the result of “perhaps” human greed and power i.e. the Junta holding out on the people for their own personal gain.

On the other hand, did God have anything to do with the way our hearts responded to their plight?

And what about China?

Did God have a part in China’s massive population so that when nature runs its course, so many lives are affected?

Did God force so many Chinese to live in mountainous regions, over or near tectonic plates?

If God removed such forces of nature, would humans then complain that the Earth is too static, too flat?

I am in awe of nature (God’s creation) when I see a tornado; a tsunami; or Mt Everest. At the same time, my heart softens when I hear of people being affected by nature. And I thank God for reminding me that I have a heart because most times it is hard.

BTW, how come so many tornadoes hit America yet so few die? is it because God favours America? or because Americans have distributed enough wealth/ education to allow its people to react/ protect themselves better? or because…

These are just a few thoughts I have on the matter.

28 05 2008
james

Deane,

Thanks for the thoughts.

Paul probably wrote Galatians before the gospels, as early as AD 48. Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John *borrow* from Paul? Probably not because Galatians doesn’t tell the *story* of Jesus in the same way the gospel accounts do. Whatever your take on dating, we must remember that if you claim to be a Christian, you must believe that the Bible is infallible, inspired by God and penned by men.

I’ll try to answer your questions, but first let me draw your attention back to the verses in the “Disaster” section. Those verses seem to me to be pretty clear as far as God’s role in catastrophes.

However, is it God’s fault that so many Burmese live in such appalling conditions that, when a cyclone passes by, it affects them so badly?.

Did God have a part in China’s massive population so that when nature runs its course, so many lives are affected?

Did God force so many Chinese to live in mountainous regions, over or near tectonic plates?

Acts 17:24-27, “The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man, nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything. And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place, that they should seek God, in the hope that they might feel their way toward him and find him. Yet he is actually not far from each one of us.”

So we see that God has placed people — everyone — in particular points in the world so that those whom he calls will seek God. And we know that God is in control over the weather and earth’s movements (check out those verses again). One of my favorite verses is in Hebrews 1:3, “Jesus is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power..” This phrase “upholds the universe” literally means to “keep it moving.” Jesus is in control of what happens in the world. And how does it do it? Literally “by his powerful word.” Pretty awe inspiring and worthy of worship if you ask me.

On the other hand, did God have anything to do with the way our hearts responded to their plight?

Just because God has ordained all things to happen and all things to come by him and for him (Rom. 11:36), doesn’t mean we are robots. Remember that God is on another playing field than we are. He is not human. He doesn’t do things like humans. God can do something that would be evil for us to do but for him it is not evil because the end result is his glory and the joy of his people. So, I feel that God does manufacture the emotions in our hearts to respond in certain ways. He certainly did that to bring us to himself, right? We were at one time dead to sin (Eph. 2) and then God drew us to himself and caused us to be affectionate toward Jesus so that we love him and want to worship him (both of which contain response and emotions). So, we respond to the disasters and it is a real response to us, though God may cause it, because God says are emotions and decisions are real. If God is the ultimate source of reality, then determining what is real or not lies in God, not us.

I hope that clears some things up and didn’t make it more confusing. I hope you’ll remember that my perspective is not a new one. It is a deeply cherished Reformed doctrine, that exists to teach that God owns the world (Ps. 24:1) and that he is actively in control. We do not serve a God “made with human hands.” He is unlike us and that is why he is so deserving of our worship and praise.

28 05 2008
james

By the way, Deane, here’s a great article to read if you haven’t already:

http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/ConferenceMessages/ByDate/1476_Is_God_Less_Glorious_Because_He_Ordained_that_Evil_Be/

8 07 2008
Melanie Stephan

Recently I found out that I got Lyme Disease from a Tick, Lone Star Tick. I thought God was looking out for me. I thought I had immunity, other people get diseases like that. Not me. God must have seen the tick climb on my leg. I know he is watching me contantly. He could have directed me to look, He could have directed me to read the newspaper about recent tick danger. He could have told me to put my bug repellant on. It wasn’t like I didn’t have some in the house. He just let it happen. Now I am not mad about God for this cause I did get some antibiotics to kill the disease. So there is a very good chance I will recover completely. In some ways I could have prevented it by staying out of the tall grass.

To the Author of this site, I think you gave me some good answers to why this happened. I am going to continue my search as to why God allows disease? “My only guess so far is that Life is not just a happy picnic, there are going to be some ants there to ruin the day. Melanie Stephan

10 07 2008
Melanie Stephan

After reading numerous web sites on Lyme disease I found one that said Deer do not get Lyme disease. Animals that prey on deer like humans, dogs and cats do get the disease. Other animals like mice and squirrels get the disease too. Deer ticks spread the disease to predators thus benefiting deer populations. What is bad for one species benefits another.

Now it took me 3 days to find this information. Whether one species disease is a benefit to the carrier species may not apply to other diseases.

There is also an old saying: “One mans loss is another mans gain”. Or in other words, “One species loss is another species gain”.

Leave a comment